We'll see of this is in any way or form sustainable, especially since uranium is also a finite ressource.
>Japanese researchers have found a technique for extracting uranium from seawater at a cost of $100–300 per kilogram of uranium, in comparison with a current cost of about $20/kg for uranium from ore. Because uranium contains so much more energy per ton than traditional fuels, this 5-fold or 15-fold increase in the cost of uranium would have little effect on the cost of nuclear power: nuclear power’s price is dominated by the cost of power-station construction and decommissioning, not by the cost of the fuel. Even a price of $300/kg would increase the cost of nuclear energy by only about 0.3 p per kWh. The expense of uranium extraction could be reduced by combining it with another use of seawater – for example, power-station cooling.
[0] https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04...
I believe at current consumption rates there is still several hundred years worth of uranium. Presumably Fusion will have been figured out by then or we've killed ourselves with a climate disaster or something worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_uranium#:~:text=According....
Doesn't seem clearcut
Also, fuel can be reprocessed, and we can use other things than Uranium