undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdisgruntledphd25y ago0 comments

The sources I'm familiar with (mostly the FT) claim otherwise.

See for example: https://www.ft.com/content/0c42dc7c-b927-477a-90b7-a202bbe4b...

Or also this: https://www.ft.com/content/61988d2d-4c95-4a35-8273-d6980af04...

0 comments

ThomPete5y ago

That article is mostly an opinion piece not really about the nuts and bolts of US intelligence concerns.

I love FT and I subscribe to the paper but I see more anti-trump sentiment than an actual argument there.

disgruntledphd2OP5y ago

Like, when a President who disagrees publicly with his own intelligence agencies claims that something is the result of intelligence, I am very sceptical.

I'm very sceptical of US intelligence justifications in general (and have been since 2003) but even more so under the current administration.

"I love FT and I subscribe to the paper but I see more anti-trump sentiment than an actual argument there. "

I really don't see any anti-Trump sentiment there, can you clarify what you mean?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse