Babylonian Multiplication in the shower (2016) (opens in new tab)

(iquilezles.org)

75 pointsplancien5y ago15 comments

15 comments

I stumbled upon this old post from Iñigo Quilez, and this made my day. Especially because I did not know about the Babylonian multiplication, let alone its proof. The absence of explanation in the post made it into a nice puzzle, I had to figure things out by myself. Maths teaching should more often be like this kickstarted discovery...

RajuVarghese5y ago

I spent some time looking at the geometric 'proof' in the photo. Was still wondering why this method would have any advantage over our conventional way of multiplying numbers because squaring would need multiplication too. Then I realized that with a table of squares one could do the calculation quite easily. To calculate the product of any 2 numbers from 1 to 100 one would need the squares of the numbers from 1 to 200. Armed with this one can calculate the product of any two numbers from 1 to 100 (there are 10'000 such combinations) with the formula. Sweet!

thomasahle5y ago

It is also useful for other things. For example it shows that the product of two normally distributed random variables has the same distribution as the difference between two independent chi square variables.

djmips5y ago

Yeah, the algorithm is only thousands of years old but it's very useful on the 6502. See 'Fast Signed Multiply' at http://www.ffd2.com/fridge/chacking/c=hacking9.txt for an implementation in C64 3D routines.

Also note that this algorithm was used in analog electronics to multiply. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2906459A/en

slongfield5y ago

And by the sum-of-odd-numbers theorem (sum of 2n-1 = n^2), you don't even need to multiply to generate that table.

2 more replies

0823498723498725y ago

Unfortunately the metamathematics of wordless proofs still needs words, maybe someone can make a proof theory without words?

https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/proofs-wit...

pubby5y ago

I made a helper image: https://i.imgur.com/CHYYhn6.png

WantonQuantum5y ago

Thank you!

krick5y ago

The idea would be more obvious if `a` woldn't be exactly `2b` in this example (granted, author wasn't at liberty to choose values). Being previously unaware of what is Babylonian multiplication, it took me quite some time to get what exactly is being conveyed. It is too tempting to read it as "2 x 1" in this case, which doesn't register as a very notable generic discovery. I suspect many people who would find it otherwise interesting simply passed by before understanding what he is trying to show us.

woofie115y ago

For those of us too lazy to think this through, do you care to post an explanation?

krick5y ago

Sure, here you go.

a — height of a white tile

b — width of a white tile

a x b — S₁, area of a white tile (this is what we are trying to "find")

(a - b)² — S₀, area of a black square

(a + b)² — S, area of a whole block (4 white tiles, 1 black tile)

Now, looking at the image it is obvious, that (S - S₀) = 4S₁.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse