Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
HumblyTossed
5y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
> Actually, that's their argument for doing it.
If AMP didn't exist I might be slightly more inclined to believe them.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
mkl
5y ago
They have a plan for that, too, a proposed standard (SXG: Signed HTTP Exchanges, currently only supported in Chrome and derivatives) that lets them hide the fact that AMP is being used:
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/11/signed-exc...
and more background:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/googles-amp-canonical-...
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse
