undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgus_massa5y ago0 comments

We used to have Matt Cutts [1] here, and he used to take a look at somewhat similar problem. I just guess that if someone is going to give e hand, s/he needs the link to take an unofficial look.

There is still a link to the old site in https://www.chess.ca/en/ws/under-construction/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cutts

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

BareNakedCoder5y ago· 2 in thread

The /en/ws/under-construction link is to http://www.chess.ca/en/ws/old-chess-ca/ which is a page on the new website that explains the dangers before you click a button to actually go to the old site. The link on the explanation page is what I removed.

dragonwriter5y ago

> which is a page on the new website that explains the dangers before you click a button to actually go to the old site.

So the new site still intentionally (contrary to your prior claim that all links were removed and that you verified this in your source) links to the old site, and you don't understand why the appeal of the badware listing due to that link failed?

BareNakedCoder5y ago

> The link on the explanation page is what I removed

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse