I think I just realized the crux of why some folks dislike agile but weren't able to express it and it has to do with the idea of what-is and what-isn't and how much dominance the "isn't" has over the owner of the belief.

If someone tries to get you to believe something and part of that belief is the active suppression of certain types of thought, and those types of thought are what actually make us intelligent. Then in some regards, agile is trying to make us less intelligent. It might be accidental, it might be unintended, but it is there. Agile attempts to create a social norm where certain thoughts are banned. Yet our ability to anticipate and predict the future is one of our largest defining traits.

There are some aspects of agile that have cult like qualities. I think agile has _improved_ many software teams and projects, esp with how those teams approach planning, but it is still important to be cognizant of thoughts that have been removed from view.