Most "real" news doesn't happen everyday. If you follow it less often you'll miss out on most fake stories and the ones that matter will still be around.
If you really want to follow the daily rumor mill you can try Twitter. Don't follow too many people and you will develop a sense for who's got good calls and who's total noise. Also many people will actually link to authoritative evidence/source, unlike most news websites that don't want you to ever leave their domain.
Generally speaking for everything that news outlets cover Twitter should have better coverage as that's where all the journalists hang out in the first place. For things that don't get covered, don't expect Twitter to do much better.
Most mainstream news about the US: Reuters, ABC News, USA Today, BBC, Wall Street Journal (News not Editorial),
You might also want to check sources like https://www.allsides.com/
You should also differentiate between news articles and opinion writing. Wapo and The Times write good analytical articles that are not biased.
"If you agree with it, it's truth. If you don't agree, it's propaganda. Pretend that it is all propaganda. See what happens on your analysis reports."
Treating allsides.com as propaganda, as another commenter here has advocated, I'd have to say that allsides.com is shifted everything left one column, or maybe more.
However, I do recommend The Wall Street Journal. They have the biases you’d imagine, but I’ve found that they’re really only overt in the opinion pages. The regular reporting is fairly straightforward, unlike say, The New York Times, which manages to inject its bias into even the most mundane of topics.
I am not American, but follow the politics. The content seems neutral to me but I haven’t really judged it seriously enough.
