Now farmers said things like 'i have never seen so little water at this time of year in the 30 years im a farmer'.
I don't have the feeling we are recognizing the elephant in the room.
My personal take on this is to buy a farm, buy water reserve tanks, have a little garden and trying to become independend. Which is not a bad plan in general as it helps to cut costs down anyway if you do it smart enough. Its not that i get money when i put it in the bank and corona showed how volatile shares can be.
Seeing trees sick and dying put climate change on my immediate threat plate 2 years ago. Too late but oh well, I am trying to change the people around me vigorously :)
We do have more data available than just what one farmer experiences.
Nonetheless, what is a good response to it?
I don't have the feeling that just ignoring it or not doing anything is a good approach.
What's the point of "the issue is more nuanced!!1!" all the time? We collectively need to act now. Everyone of us. You are draining momentum to what end?
I'd be more interested in long-time temperature increases in specific remote areas. One of the oldest continuous temperature records on a mountain in Germany shows less than 0.7C since 1800: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohenpeißenberg_Meteorological...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohenpeißenberg_Meteorological...
https://www.skepticalscience.com/urban-heat-island-effect.ht...
Are you specifically clamining that the authors ignored this ?
I am specifically claiming that there is no known global temperature dataset that is frequently used in such alarming studies and contains no stations affected by the UHI effect. Since the linked article contains no references or links to sources, I cannot be more specific.
Beyond that, this is a standard disinformation talking point. It's been debunked here: https://www.skepticalscience.com/urban-heat-island-effect.ht...
But it's easy to find more sources.
There are thousands of measurement stations spread across the globe - on land, in the ocean and in the air.
Four independent datasets are generated by different groups: Scientists use four major datasets to study global temperature. The UK Met Office Hadley Centre and the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit jointly produce HadCRUT4 .
In the US, the GISTEMP series comes via the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences (GISS), while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) creates the MLOST record. The Japan Meteorological Agency ( JMA) produces a fourth dataset.
Edit: There is also credible evidence we've been underestimating climate sensitivity for years: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01484-5
The US and China are increasing hostilities and are locked in a downward spiral of increased military spending (and associated emissions).
Most of the economic elite, while paying lip service is in utter denial about the direness of the situation.
With a few exceptions (New Zealand), every developed and developing society is prioritizing the economy and economic development over the preservation of a viable human future.
We're bordering on insanity.
Perhaps it's an attempt to maintain their reputation for sloppy editing.
https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-observer-style-guide-c (under "Celsius")