Are you flat out saying that some sexes are not intelligent enough to be in the tech industry?
This is also the expected result if you're familiar with GMV as mediated by sex chromosome pseudodominance in most mammals, including humans.
A glance at Wikipedia shows that this statement is contested. Pretty much every statement about men, women, intelligence, and IQ is contested.
> This is also the expected result if you're familiar with GMV
OK, I'll bite.
https://bsd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13293-019-02...
"few sex differences (if any) remain statistically significant"
It amuses me that any article about racism and sexism in the tech inevitably devolves to "It's not racism and sexism if we just think that other races and sexes don't perform well in the tech industry."
Well obviously, but most of the contests against hard IQ data don’t have much merit.
> <link to paper about gray matter volume>
GMV isn’t “gray matter volume”, it’s “greater male variability” - hence the mention of sex chromosome pseudodominance.
> in the tech industry.
It’s not just the tech industry - every industry will have some selective pressures.
The argument is going to boil down to the “pipeline” problem, ‘there’s not enough to begin with for it to be represented in proportion’, which leads to the moral hazard dilemma of do we just started filling quotas.
Edited
As long as tech workers think that some races have 'cultural' problems and as long as some tech workings think that there are differences between men's and women's brains that make women less suited for tech work, I think we have to stop dismissing this as a pipeline problem.
The prejudice is real and all over this thread posters are happily justifying it.
If so, that only supports allegations of racism and sexism in the tech industry.
