undefined | Better HN

Skip to content

Top Best Ask Show New Jobs

0 pointsnaasking5y ago0 comments

> If there issue is with other forms of tracking, they could implement a browser which supports a small subset of the HTTP protocol which does not allow any tracking of any kind.

They did. That's the Gemini protocol. I recommend reading the spec to properly understand the constraints they were trying to meet.

0 comments

5 comments · 3 top-level

jhardy545y ago· 2 in thread

Gemeni is a subset of HTTP?! I thought it was similar to HTTP, like Gopher. Could you link to the relevant docs?

naaskingOP5y ago

It very closely resembles HTTP 0.9. It's pretty much a single line protocol, like "GET [URL]crlf" over TLS, and that's it.

That's not what subset means though.

harikb5y ago

With a text like this, you can’t blame the readers assuming incompatibility and losing interest

> Now, what does Gemini currently have to offer? The best way to find out is to head over to the official site: gemini.circumlunar.space in your Gemini browser.

The Gemini protocol throws away a huge number of advances - in effect throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Gemini protocol could have been a subset of HTTP and the document format could have been a subset of HTML. For instance, if you decide to not implement cookies, javascript etc but if you retain the ability to have formatting for texts, tables, images etc it would have been sufficient.

And even in the case of images, the protocol could have mandated that images cannot be accessed cross-site. The same restrictions could have been placed on other aspects such as the style sheets.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse