> Rigging (digital or not) would be hard to hide, because it could only be a minor adjustment to remain plausible.
How many more votes would the party in second place at the last election have needed in order to have won instead?
> If some party suddenly receives a lot more votes than they polled for - it will be noticed.
Is there a mechanism by which the election could be run again (before the winners of the election have a chance to prevent this)?
> Also Estonia already has a history of (non-digital) election rigging
Or it's an argument that a voting system should have both hand-counting and digital counting, because rigging both counts is at least twice as difficult as rigging one.