This is a spectacularly wrong example. Dozens of countries in every continent but Antarctica[1] are holding support protests of their own.
While I agree with the larger point that the way most people consume news—and the way they are fed to us—is problematic, the author’s tone felt almost insulting. I recommend Aaron Swartz’s take on the subject instead.[2]
[1]: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/map-george-floyd-protests...
> News is entertainment. Quick gratification that lasts a day, at max.
I would say an important qualifier here is that most news is entertainment, but the very long-tail of what we might call news -- actual high-quality journalism (investigative or not) -- is critically important.
I agree here that the majority of news media is infotainment. But there is an important place for high-quality long-form journalism, which effectively exists in society to do hard thinking and investigating that's basically impossible without the resources, infrastructure and support of a news organization.
Yes, "news" is trash, and some "journalism" is too, but the very long-tail, the 1% of the really high-quality stuff, is critically important, and a free and open society probably collapses without it.
