undefined | Better HN

0 points9nGQluzmnq3M5y ago0 comments

But the title is "worst year to be alive", so while the contrast of 536 was likely the biggest, measured objectively by food availability, life expectancy etc 543 was the worst.

0 comments

TrainedMonkey5y ago

Objectively you are right, subjectively that statement is technically correct and that is worst kind of correct :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 points9nGQluzmnq3M5y ago0 comments

But the title is "worst year to be alive", so while the contrast of 536 was likely the biggest, measured objectively by food availability, life expectancy etc 543 was the worst.

0 comments

TrainedMonkey5y ago

Objectively you are right, subjectively that statement is technically correct and that is worst kind of correct :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse