Now they've added some mojo to prevent this but still sell location data.
So how about running the same attack but instead of using the browser and their own website just use the bought location data.
I suspect they didn't fix that as I've disabled appreaing on their heatmap but they still sold my location data when I forgot to disable my vpn during a run some time ago.
There were also armchair people wondering about other tracks in various places in the world.
https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/how-tos/2018/01/29/stra...
What's the punishment for having GPS tracking devices on a military base?
Bet they all love their free USB drives sent from a friend they forgot they had, too.
Hope they're epoxying the USB connections on their Win95 nuclear submarines.
I have ones around my home and where I work. No idea if that affects whatever data they sell (I doubt it, since you can still the full activity yourself even with a privacy zone), but stops people finding where you live/work and nicking your bike
Strava publish a "heat map" that shows aggregated activity of all their users. It's useful for finding common running/biking routes in areas you don't know well. That's how the military bases were found.
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#7.00/-120.90000/38.36000/hot/...
EDIT: I forgot that Strava do sell heatmap data to government transportation departments and such so I fixed the comment.
The NRK subsidiary NRKbeta has "connected the dots" from that data set. In this article they present how they could track down military personnel visiting restricted military sites in Norway, including the disputed radar installation in Vardø, close to the Russian border.
"NRKbeta is NRKs sandbox for technology and media. We write about media, the internet and new technology with a focus on you as the user, and what we at NRK do in this field. We call it a sandbox because we want to test things out, be curious and find out how things change. And bring you, the users, with us on this journey."
EDIT:
I also think it's important to contextualize this journalism with the current debate around the Norwegian contact tracing application.
The application has been heavily criticized for the collection of GPS data for research usage and track behaviour when new guidelines are announced. They claim this data is going to be "anonymized", but alter clarified it would only be "pseudonomized".
It is also unclear if the data collected is going to be deleted in December, when the app is set for deletion by the current regulation from Stortinget.
Back when Wikileaks released the Afghan War Diary, I wonder what would have happened if rather than a whistleblowers we would have people buying data collected from soldiers smartphones in order to reconstruct the material. It should be pretty easy to identify colaborators by which smartphone gets into contact with someones else smartphone thus reconstruct who is working with who.
A lot of British intelligence during WW2 was gleamed not from the contents of the messages they intercepted, but rather from tracking who was where and communicating with whom.
And if you stop soldiers from using mobile phones on restricted ground, you are just going to have lots of tracks stopping abruptly at the gates and secure facilities identifiable by their lack of emissions.
Patterns.
There have been great examples of correctly identifying the crews of nuclear submarines by their predictable periods of time offline.
In any case, the attack here was to identify personnel based on known locations, not finding new locations in the first place. Big bases can't be hidden anyway, the best you can do is conceal what happens indoor in them so it seems silly to let foreign intelligence track personnel movement inside a base...
I'm sorry, but we have enough trouble getting this audience to read the articles as it is.
Original article is in Norwegian.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/locat...