> - It provides rich types with some odd limitations: strings, sets, lists, and binaries do not allow empty values.
That is _infuriating_
It's documented, but it is so surprising when you first hit it. Sometimes, empty values have semantics attached to them, I don't want to scrub them out.
I think that basically describes DDB in a nutshell. You think it’s like Mongo, only on AWS, but then you slowly find out it’s much, much worse (for most use cases that you’d go with Mongo).
