undefined | Better HN

0 pointsLatteLazy5y ago0 comments

It's not illegal in the UK either I'm afraid. In fact, it's standard.

Im not saying this is nice or positive. Just that it's totally legal and pretty standard.

I know because my first proper employer did NOT put this clause in my contract. Then they tried to introduce it for me and others after adding it for new employees. So I (we, there were 5 of us) actually sought legal advice.

The lawyer was surprised it wasn't in the original contract (and it's been in all the employment contracts I've signed since). Since it wasn't there, they couldn't enforce it or make us sign it. So we were lucky.

Its a hard thing to decide because the alternative is banning this sort of program. Then the only people who get to be pilots are the ones with 130k to spare...

0 comments

iguy5y ago

An important distinction here is surely between voluntary departure, and being laid off. What did the clause you mention cover?

Seems like a fair concern for a company not to have their freshly trained employees get poached by the competition the day they start being useful. (Although IMO it would be better to structure it as a lower salary while in training and a bonus which vests in a year.) But people they have decide to fire is a different matter.

LatteLazyOP5y ago

Morally there is a difference but legally there isn't. In the uk, the clauses I have seen all say (some variation of) "leave our employ for any reason".

I can understand why. If you don't have to pay 130k back as long as you get fired, that's a huge incentive to get yourself fired right?

I think it's a dumb problem caused by governments failing to fund training/education. But as long as that's the case, people need to read their contracts and only sign things they understand...

iguy5y ago

OK, thanks. I am surprised though. Doesn't lots of employment law make a distinction between "fired with cause" and "downsizing"?

Lots of questions, but also: Can they actually collect this?

I guess my proposal of "half pay while training & a post-dated check" probably lines up with "leave our employ for any reason".

1 more reply

arethuza5y ago

A manager at a previous employer thought it would be a good idea to get people to sign a letter saying we'd be liable for training costs if we left within X months of taking the training.

Like most people I simply ignored the request!

Most of the training I was getting was hyper specific to particular financial/ERP applications that if I left I'd be running away from ever seeing those applications again....

chrisseaton5y ago

Is it not still the case that that almost all commercial pilots come from people leaving the military or has that changed?

LatteLazyOP5y ago

I don't know to be honest. I don't think so, as there are really not many military pilots compared to commercial? But I'm no expert.

Quickie edit...

Google says the RAF has 1830 pilots and the Navy about 200 more but the UK has over 10,000 commercial pilots. So I guess at least half the commercial pilots trained outside the military. So they're either self funding or getting these employer funded loans?

1 more reply

yardie5y ago

That hasn’t been the case in decades. When TWA was expanding they had a large pool of WWII pilots. Training for military pilots is very expensive as well. They won’t want to waste it on someone who’s only sticking around 5 years.

C1sc0cat5y ago

I did say "strictly limit /regulate" and just because some one puts something in a contract doesn't make it enforceable (justiciable)

And in the UK you would NOT want to cross BALPA (pilots union) if an airline tried this.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsLatteLazy5y ago0 comments

It's not illegal in the UK either I'm afraid. In fact, it's standard.

Im not saying this is nice or positive. Just that it's totally legal and pretty standard.

Its a hard thing to decide because the alternative is banning this sort of program. Then the only people who get to be pilots are the ones with 130k to spare...

0 comments

iguy5y ago

An important distinction here is surely between voluntary departure, and being laid off. What did the clause you mention cover?

LatteLazyOP5y ago

Morally there is a difference but legally there isn't. In the uk, the clauses I have seen all say (some variation of) "leave our employ for any reason".

I can understand why. If you don't have to pay 130k back as long as you get fired, that's a huge incentive to get yourself fired right?

I think it's a dumb problem caused by governments failing to fund training/education. But as long as that's the case, people need to read their contracts and only sign things they understand...

iguy5y ago

OK, thanks. I am surprised though. Doesn't lots of employment law make a distinction between "fired with cause" and "downsizing"?

Lots of questions, but also: Can they actually collect this?

I guess my proposal of "half pay while training & a post-dated check" probably lines up with "leave our employ for any reason".

1 more reply

arethuza5y ago

A manager at a previous employer thought it would be a good idea to get people to sign a letter saying we'd be liable for training costs if we left within X months of taking the training.

Like most people I simply ignored the request!

Most of the training I was getting was hyper specific to particular financial/ERP applications that if I left I'd be running away from ever seeing those applications again....

chrisseaton5y ago

Is it not still the case that that almost all commercial pilots come from people leaving the military or has that changed?

LatteLazyOP5y ago

I don't know to be honest. I don't think so, as there are really not many military pilots compared to commercial? But I'm no expert.

Quickie edit...

1 more reply

yardie5y ago

C1sc0cat5y ago

I did say "strictly limit /regulate" and just because some one puts something in a contract doesn't make it enforceable (justiciable)

And in the UK you would NOT want to cross BALPA (pilots union) if an airline tried this.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse