That’s because they’re not decrying the wages or health benefits, but the overall treatment and union-busting.
You can have good wages and benefits for this kind of labor without firing organizers, plotting to smear them as “inarticulate” in the press, and exposing workers to undue injury and disease.
The top-voted comment on your thread suggests otherwise.
I think the workers should be receiving more in hazard pay, but this whole round of controversy was sparked by their firing warehouse workers organizing for better safety, not pay.
Where do you work, BTW? Your account is about a month old and only seems to comment on stories about Amazon.
