Seriously. Why would you ever buy a computer that you need to remove the screen from to replace a part like an HDD with a high failure rate?
I have a friend with a 2011 27" iMac that uses thunderbolt 1. It has an absurdly slow HDD. I was going to try to help her upgrade it, but I can't find a TB1 enclosure to put an SSD into. The other choice is FW800, and those are incredibly rare too.
I'm actually shopping for these as we speak, so reading this article was very timely..
EDIT: Finally found a FW800 SATA 2.5" enclosure on Amazon that I can pop an SSD into. Sadly it was more expensive than a cheap SSD.
And now I have to deal with Catalina. Either it's a lemon, or there's something deeply masochistic about apple users. I have fixed enough inane issues with friends' macbooks to suspect the latter (these include: 2x broken SATA cables, 2 shitty solder jobs (of which one was "fixed" by Apple by pressing the chip down with a rubber pad against the chassi. It broke again), several things that just magically disconnected themselves inside an unopened laptop (with apple quoting several thousand SEK repair costs). All of this while providing arguably the worst repair experience of all time (the only real competition I have met is the previous gen MS surface). Yet the people I have helped still praise apple's superior quality.
I know this won't be as easy to work on as my old thinkpads, but should I be concerned about warranty repairs? If so, I might want to consider a cheap chromebook solely to use in my warehouse.
Apple's hypocrisy is overwhelming.
Don't forget that Al Gore, who Wikipedia calls an "environmentalist" in the very first sentence, has been on their Board of Directors for many years.[1] Twenty eight years ago he wrote the book Earth in the Balance to warn us about ecological problems.
He's taken millions of dollars from Apple, and together they've done jack-shit about repairability. There is some argument to be made for lower repairability in laptops, but WTF is their excuse for iMac desktops???
They're all Gulfsteam environmentalists, jetting off to places like Davos where they can cavort with others of their ilk while lecturing the rest of us on how bad things are.
If you know how to diagnose a bad drive and replace it, don't buy an iMac. The vast majority of people would need to bring a broken computer into a repair shop to replace the drive, even if that computer were a PC with a highly accessible solid state drive. I won't ever buy a mac again, but it makes sense for some people to do so.
Almost every single one of those that we bought, had a hard drive failure. They used WD Green drives. I replaced them with WD Blacks, and if SSD's had been cheaper in 2012/13 we would have used them, but these were graphics designers.
You will need to control the fans with software like SMC Fan Control, which is annoying, or better yet, this harness: https://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/DIDIMACHDD11/
You can pop the glass off an iMac with a credit card (or your fingernails, they don't glue them on that year, instead they used magnets) and with a torx bit you can tilt the screen out of the way and pull the bad drive out.
When you are doing heavy lifting, the iMac isn't that good enough?
Removing the screen cover is easy - all you need is a couple suction cups: https://www.ebay.com/itm/323959879241
I don't mind turning screws, but I'm not going to mess with glass and glue and stuff. I'm clumsy and afraid I'll break something just by looking at it wrong. Especially on something that isn't mine.
I have only owned iMacs since they switched to Intel, starting with a 24 inch to having passed through to my third 27 model. I never once had an issue other than software related.
Now I do agree with many that have stated that Apple should long go have ditched spinning hard drives and I am still amazed they did not. I would like to see some hard evidence of failure rates, I doubt it could be as bad as many think it is but considering how long Apple recently allowed their keyboard issues to manifest I could be wrong
What I find shameful is that in 2020 Apple is STILL SELLING 5400rpm spinnng drives as the base drive in iMacs. https://www.apple.com/imac/specs/
When I see how many people complain about their macs, it reminds me of the oldsters complaining about problems with their Buicks and Chevys long ago. After WWII there were large parts of the population such as veterans, Italians, Polish, and Jewish people who would not buy a Japanese or German car. These people let the quality of American cars deteriorate dangerously because they'd buy any bucket of bolts and rust that Detroit would offer. Slowly these people died off or eventually got burned so bad by a lemon they bought that by the 2008 financial crisis the last two hold outs, car rental companies and police departments, were wavering.
Detroit realized that shipping crap cars to car rental companies just meant that people who never drove American cans would be certain to drive bad ones, and decide that they never will drive American cars.
Cops in my area went so far as to road-test Hondas, but they are still stuck with getting American cars from an industry that isn't really sure if it wants to build police cars.
It is the same with the mac. There are many unhappy people who think using a different computer is like putting a hand in a toilet, so they are afraid to upgrade to better computers that are available on a competitive market.
A lot of the trouble in the software biz in the last 10 years or so is that there is a certain kind of company that buys every dev a mac, and that they live in a world that is so insular that they never meet anybody who uses a PC, although most of the end users have PCs.
Then they wonder why they can't sell any software and can only get acqui-hired.
Kudos to the software Carbon Copy Cloner. Everything is as before and lost only 4 weeks of data because of an old image (but that's okay, not super important).
Lessons learned:
- Test your backup strategy and your backups !!
- External APFS or HFS drives cannot be read by Linux (especially if encrypted with FileVault). Maybe I will switch to Veracrypt + NTFS (or FAT32) for external drives in the long-run.
- Restoring in recovery mode from a sparseimage did not worked out. A real 1:1 copy on an external drive is better and immediately bootable.
- Installing macOS Mojave on a bigger USB stick is slooow (3 hours?), the same goes for booting, but it seemed the only option for me to use Carbon Copy Cloner to restore to the internal ssd.
- Do more regular backups
- Maybe monitoring the internal SSDs health in future? The software drivedx looks interesting.
- side note on Linux: pinch and zoom gesture on trackpads is totally non existent on Linux desktop (even Windows is better with this). There are not even interfaces for it as far as I've seen.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Sintech-Adapter-Upgrade-2013-2016-201...
EDITED to add: I'm doing some homework to identify my next laptop. It won't be an Apple. Ideally something with an aluminium chassis, 13" screen, 32GB RAM, and 512GB SSD. i7 or AMD equivalent. Suggestions welcome!
Do people no longer go to Best Buy, Staples, Micro Center...?
The whole Apple "We won't let you install old OS's" and "Good luck finding an old OS install image. Ha! Ha!" infuriates me.
I don't want to have to go trawling through Warez sites just to find a version of OS X compatible with a 5 year old computer.
One thing I've learned over the years is that if you suspect a hardware failure, especially to the boot drive, there's a very good chance that a reboot is not going to succeed. As the article shows, the "true end" came not long after that. Good that he has backups, and that's probably why he could even forget about it.
The drive supposedly has 128 MB of cache memory, but it’s only 5400 rpm, and while its speed has never been a noticeable problem while making backups, it’s painful beyond belief to use as a boot drive. USB 3.0 might theoretically be capable of 625 MBps, but when I tested the drive in Blackmagic Speed Test, it averaged just 20–25 MBps for both read and write speeds.
Maybe SSDs have spoiled us, but I'm still surprised just how much disk activity newer OSes produce, especially upon boot; or perhaps it's just the non-default stuff loaded upon startup by apps, which can easily build up without affecting performance if you normally have an ultra-fast SSD. I know someone who used a regular USB flash drive (probably <10MB/s) with a "portable" copy of XP for several years as a basic minimal development environment, and it wasn't actually slower than a HDD of the time; in fact, it was quite responsive, probably due to the much better random read performance of flash vs. a spinning disk.
I don't know when that was exactly. 9-10 years ago or thereabouts? I just quite distinctly remember the experience of upgrading the OS, and straight away finding that the boot time had gone from 15 seconds to 1 minute :(
That was annoying back then, but I don't think it's a problem nowadays. Technology has moved on, just as it moved on from the floppy disk and the Pentium 3 and so on. If anything, mechanical hard drives are doing well to still be useful - the price/performance/capacity tradeoff remains decent! Just not decent enough to use one as your boot drive.
I found this odd. My 2.5" Seagate and WD external USB 3.0 HDD will both run 120MBs+ using Black Magic.
Not that it would be something you would want to use as an OS boot drive, you'd want the Samsung T5 SSD that the author ended up buying.
I'd download that to another computer and make a bootable usb drive.