* Exploring technological opportunities by linking technology and products: Application of morphology analysis and text mining (Byungun Yoon a,⁎, Inchae Park a, Byoung-youl Coh b) * Technology opportunity discovery (TOD) from existing technologies and products: A function-based TOD framework (Janghyeok Yoon a, Hyunseok Park b, Wonchul Seo c, Jae-Min Lee d, Byoung-youl Coh d,⁎, Jonghwa Kim a,⁎⁎) * Investigating technology opportunities: the use of SAOx analysis (Kyuwoong Kim1 · Kyeongmin Park1 · Sungjoo Lee1) * Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling (Abdolreza Momeni a, Katja Rost b,⁎) * A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables (Frank M. Bass) * Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks (Janghyeok Yoon • Kwangsoo Kim) * Innovation hotspots in food waste treatment, biogas, and anaerobic digestion technology: A natural language processing approach (Djavan De Clercq a, Zongguo Wen a,⁎, Qingbin Song b) * TrendPerceptor: A property–function based technology intelligence system for identifying technology trends from patents (Janghyeok Yoon, Kwangsoo Kim)
How interesting I find the paper's ideas.
Would what the paper proposes work with large data sets and can what the paper proposes be (fully) automated.
Can I implement it (do I understand it enough, do I have access to the data)?
The webpage looks clean. The ratios of graphic elements to their scale is pleasant. The two-tone color palette is pleasant. The line length in the main screen (~140 c/l) is a bit much for my taste.
As far as the Try now, I'm not sure how these relate to each other. Maybe a video demo walk-through taking one technology, such as the digital watch (which we are all familiar) and walking it through the site?
As a "Try now" user, until I can throw in any random data and see it propagate through your product, I won't realize what you've accomplished.
Thanks for your feedback regarding the main page. I also like the design, but not because I made, but because the developers behind the templates did such a great job: https://startbootstrap.com/themes/sb-admin-2/ + https://blackrockdigital.github.io/startbootstrap-landing-pa...
I probably should give them credit more prominently (right now, I do it only in the source code).
Regarding the "try now": I have never thought that this will be an issue. On the contrary, I thought that different data across different features will enable people to better understand the variety of the product. But what you are saying makes absolute sense. I have added your points to my todo.
Again, thanks a lot for your feedback - it really helped.
Clearly, that’s asking a lot both in terms, work and IP disclosure, but I am guessing what the average user would want, that is they have a specific need based on existing documents that the want ingested for analysis. Maybe I am wrong, but agree when doing a quick look, aside from the raw data & code, what I thought to look for to try and understand what was really there.
But "creators and inventors" goes in the direction I was thinking. Additionally, innovation consultants, tech. advisors, "policy makers" or people who have to decide on technology but lack technical expertise in certain fields, engineers...
Creators & inventors tend to want a lot of freebies in my experience.
Technology-related information are: functions (what the technology can do) and properties/components (of what is this technology made up)
