Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
ced
6y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Yeah, but this version is not necessarily optimal. If you have 4 positive samples, then you will test 2+2+1+1+1+1 = 8, instead of 4 in the naive case.
It feels like a problem for information theory.
0 comments
2 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
bequanna
6y ago
· 1 in thread
I didn’t say it was optimal, but it is a huge improvement on doing 64 tests for 64 samples.
ced
OP
6y ago
Oh, sure!
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse