I am thinking that Corona is killing the same people who would have died from regular flu for the most part, i.e. it's not in addition to normal deaths. I understand that this is a minority opinion, but data may bear it out eventually.
Because of a lack of ICU facilities, governments are hoping to push the critical point out as far as possible.
I think the CFR stat is especially misleading, and we shouldn't be trying to compare it. For instance, if a country simply has a longer lag between testing and reporting the tests, the CFR will look higher. CFR will also look lower if the growth rate is high.
I made a little hypothetical to illustrate this.
Imagine a disease where your skin turns bright green on day 8 and you drop dead on day 30, without fail for all infections. It's growing 25% a day. What's the "CFR" at day 100?
In this hypothetical, all infections are symptomatic, all symptomatic cases are detected, and all symptomatic cases are fatal. But people don't drop dead immediately -- it takes 22 days, and at 25% a day the number of cases grows 135x in that period.
So even though this fictional disease is 100% fatal, the "case fatality ratio" will stay under 1% all the way through the growth phase.
In summary: those stats aren't really evidence that Germany's outbreak is progressing any differently from anyone else's. The information is much too vague to say one way or another. Instead the baseline assumption is, Germany has the same virus as everywhere else, and is applying the same treatments. So for any individual patients, the outlooks will be the same here as anywhere else that still has ICU beds and ventilators available.
The lack of standardized reporting is odd considering the impacts. It definitely seems to be contributing to the general confusion on decision making.
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus...
Basically every patient that shows symptoms of pneumonia gets tested for Covid-19 now, as well as all persons that were in direct contact with such a patient. Currently about 360,000 tests are done per week in Germany, next week more than 500,000 are projected. No country in the world tests more people per capital currently, so I really don’t think the numbers are underreported.
Right now the same source (for Germany):
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/
Has 23 "Serious or critical" people out of 41,324 cases (and the remaining 41,301 are in "Mild condition").
In Italy:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/
3,612 critical out of 62,013 total (6%).
In Spain:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/spain/
3,166 critical out of 46,406 total (7%).
In France (seemingly much worse than Italy or Spain):
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/france/
3,375 critical out of 22,511 total (15%).
Now France's anomaly (compared to Italy and Spain) could be an undercounting (by 2x) of total cases, but the anomaly in Germany could only be explained if the actual number of cases in Spain and Italy are undercounted by 100x!
There must be something else.
If Germany is not reporting a death if a person has high blood pressure, then I think theirs are under. The death rate from numbers I had seen were like 10x more fatal if you have some other issue.
IMHO Italy is more accurate, because it could be said that the deaths would not have occurred, yet, without Covid.
Other explanation, per an email from a German relative: Germany is probably the only country in the EU where following the WHO recommendation of 1m distancing will bring people closer together'