Their license is very permissive also for use in commercial settings.
(No affiliation.)
Then there's the lack (last time I checked) of any sort of releases for all those images of people and even properties that are needed when making commercial use.
https://unsplash.com/photos/lhah6lFnims
NB The description on the picture itself is fine - its the top level description in the search results that is a bit odd
[1] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/unsplash-wallpapers/id12848638...
And open source is a social equalizer, it allows those who couldn't afford to license code a place to have access to and learn about coding, and development process.
Your argument basically sounds like we should close all public libraries because they rob the authors of books profits.
I would also argue that there are very few people that are being tricked into working on open source projects. Open source repos are worked on by people from all walks of life from people would went to the best colleges in the world, to people who didn't finish high school.
I love to know where you got these notitions from.
On an economic level, it ignores all of the benefits of open source materials, claims that more expensive goods result in greater wealth, and doesn’t account for comparative advantage.
all nine looked like random point and click photos - soft focus, poor lighting, no composition - as if, in fact, you'd faced a landscape feature and taken a photo with no thought to how to present it.
I'm not going to click through all the images, but based on the sample I took it doesn't deserve the 'beautiful' adjective.
I haven't added many from the "Wiki Loves Earth" competition yet. They might be better from your perspective.
Did not expect to see this here. Nor was I expecting to see myself already subscribed to his repo.
Edit: I have now noticed you posted it yourself, Grant :)
Hardly stunning or beautiful.