undefined | Better HN

0 pointsm_que6y ago0 comments

This is the foundation for 'programming' morphogenesis of multi-cellular synthetic life in the far future. Of course you first have to get the programming of monocelluar life to work.

Also, the reverse might be possible, i.e., decompiling genetic code from phenotype and so on.

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

imvetri6y ago· 1 in thread

Foundation for programming the morphogenesis. Yes.

morphogenesis - concept is fundamentally flawed. It's not thoroughly put in theories. Computing has touring test. Does concepts like morphogenesis has any tests? Nope. So building something on top of half baked concepts will not scale/sustain/be a foundation.

If we really had understood morphogenesis in the past and the it is 100% put in theories, we would be having a virtual world mimicking biological world by now.

m_queOP6y ago

Yes, morphological models can be tested. You can hypothesize to reactions to alterations of an organism structurally and chemically (morphogenes). Diffusion-reaction models are available for certain kind of morphogenetic behavior. See also https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2014/march/turingpnas.html

dropit_sphere6y ago· 1 in thread

>Also, the reverse might be possible, i.e., decompiling genetic code from phenotype and so on.

I don't know anything about decompiling or ML, but doesn't the black box nature of NN rules this out?

m_queOP6y ago

NNs are not a black box in the sense that you cannot see what is going on in them, but in the sense that we currently just very badly understand. You have a function approximator that you have to translate into some other representation. As long as you know how basic building blocks map or can be approximated, it might be possible.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse