undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdecklin15y ago0 comments

Yes, but if you want to be honest about numbers, you should say something like

Reddit.com HTML.: 37.6 KB Text in that HTML: 5.9 KB

(That's just what I got from copy+pasting.) The difference at issue is loading another 37.6 KB page versus loading whatever part of that 5.9 KB is the "interesting" text (i.e. probably not the header or footer) plus its links and styles and the overhead of whatever you want to stick it in (JSON, an HTML fragment, etc). The huge CSS and JS files are not reloaded every time you go to a new page.

0 comments

mtrpcic15y ago

That's a good point. The big issue is loading the "Heavy" part of the DOM every time (navigation links, header/footer, user panel, etc), rather than the real "content". I'll make an edit and make that a more prominent point. Thanks for the feedback. If you don't mind my asking, how did you pull the 5.9KB number out of the 37.6 one? Just checked the size of the interesting part of the page once saved into a new file?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsdecklin15y ago0 comments

Yes, but if you want to be honest about numbers, you should say something like

Reddit.com HTML.: 37.6 KB Text in that HTML: 5.9 KB

0 comments

mtrpcic15y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse