Nah.

I work a bit as a musician, and I would say I often, but not always, create "true art" when I'm hired for a concert.

But it's not the same art I would have made if I got to call all the shots. That doesn't necessarily make it any less good, and it doesn't make it less "true", but it _does_ make it less _mine_. I'm OK with that tradeoff.

I think the discussion about what constitutes "true art" is separate from this. I'm saying that in the long run, it is unlikely that you can keep passionate about something you depend on for food and shelter. I, too, can think of examples where either monetizing up front or simply happening to create something that made you rich has been combined with true passion.

But, if you're going to spend the rest of your life creating something and expect to keep earning money from it, there will be less passion and more tedium.

> Or it helped you understand what your audience cares about and make something more relatable or moving

I'd say that's not about your passion or vision, then, but rather about creating something others will feel passionate about. It's a big difference.