Ask HN: Linux, too many changes in not many years

What is the big issue with systemd? I would recommend re-learning somethings.. it seems like any distro worth using in production is using systemd or migrating towards systemd. BSD (which isn't linux) being the exception.

There are some systemd-less distributions like devuan, or what I would personally recommend, Void Linux[0]. Void has been my daily driver for over a year now, and it's been lots of fun, while also being rather stable.

Be aware that it is a rolling release distro, much like Arch Linux and it comes with its drawbacks as well. It uses runit as its init system, which is easily configured via shell scripts, and certainly won't change in the near future, because it's feature complete.

Void comes with it's own package manager, "xbps" (X binary package system), which is used a lot like pacman on Arch Linux. You can even freeze packages if you don't want to upgrade them.

All in all, I'd recommend it, but be sure to play around with it for a bit before settling on it. (Oh, and the installer is a lot easier thatn Arch's too, and there are live CDs with desktop environments pre-installed if that's your thing)

[0]https://voidlinux.org/

I understand your frustration, I sometimes have it myself when trying to figure out something obscure. And this kind of "knowledge rot" is indeed becoming a huge issue in the main search engines.

Arch Linux provides awesome documentation though. Slackware still follows the old ways iirc.

For *BSD, I'd personally stick with OpenBSD, but not sure how great you can expect it to be as a distro.

Things evolve. If you’re looking for something more conservative, try Slackware Linux, CentOS, or one of the BSDs.

Linux is evolving and diversifying fast. I'm afraid this will be more so in the future.

Fedora, but that uses systemd.

Works on my machine.