undefined | Better HN

0 pointskrapp6y ago0 comments

Just because pedophiles are common on social media doesn't mean they're particularly lucrative as a demographic . It's not as if they can legally form pro-pedo groups and chat and share child porn and create a social graph around their interests that would be of any value to advertisers.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

foxylad6y ago· 2 in thread

Your comment triggered the thought that blackmail is INCREDIBLY lucrative.

So much so that I'm surprised it hasn't already happened. If favourite rogue state infiltrated FB/IG enough to do what Bark is doing on a system level... that's a scary amount of leverage.

And it's difficult to see how our society could protect against it.

bagacrap6y ago

Leverage against some random dirtbag who lives in a trailer? The bigwigs are using services like Epstein's, not Instagram spam. And they successfully shut down that potential threat when he was compromised.

int_19h6y ago

There's a lot of spectrum between a trailer and Epstein. And you don't necessarily need people in Epstein's social circle, for such a scheme to pay off. Industrial espionage and sabotage doesn't require bigwigs - worker bees that happen to have access to things just so that they can do their daily job can do a lot.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse