undefined | Better HN

0 pointsSilasX6y ago0 comments

I'm speaking for the quality of discussion that happens when everyone is aware of the all the facts presented in the article, vs when everyone is mired in unproductive guesswork because they missed the critical details of the threat vector because it's wedged between a description of some boss's pursed lips and the coffee used that in that office.

Edit: And "buddy"? Really?

0 comments

robocat6y ago

Alternatively, The Register article contains so little information you can't discuss much and hners create their own "facts".

SilasXOP6y ago

Only if the debate hinges on the idiosyncratic mannerisms of the subjects of the story. I saw plenty of substantive facts in the Register article, with less filler.

notzuck6y ago

Just accept that not everyone wants the same as you.

I like brevity but the first article painted a much better picture. The second one barely a dip into the most pertinent facts. This company is unknown to most and without the backstory my care level was at 0.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse