>No it's not. They're likely going to track IP addresses and make assumptions there.
So? Unless Google is getting direct data from ISPs and requesting personal information about your identity from them then your IP address is just as useless to them as it is to me for linking your tastes to your human identity. Browser fingerprinting, in the Panopticlick sense, is just as useless to that end. At Google's scale the Panopticlick method doesn't even work because of how many people they come across. Once the number of browsers that match your "fingerprint" is > 1 it becomes useless to them.
>I'm sorry, but people like you are way too complacent.
I'm not complacent, I just know what I'm talking about. Take the tin-foil hat off.
>People like us know a little history. Things can get nasty.
You are so full yourself. You have no idea what you're talking about.