Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
late2part
6y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
I meant if he were tried, he should be found not guilty.
Separately, because what he did is prima facie for the greater good, he should not be tried.
0 comments
2 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
bumby
6y ago
· 1 in thread
A jury or pardon could conceivably provide the first, but the latter would require a movement away from the rule of law. Outside of a jury or prosecutor, who has claim to make the call that what he did was for the greater good?
late2part
OP
6y ago
The prosecutor is sufficient.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse