Really, this is reaching.
'May, could, if, likely, might, could'
How many weasel words can you cram into one hypothetical?
How about: It is possible that had Lamo not turned in Manning that we have no clue on how things happened past that point because it didn't happen.
It's honestly still a controversial opinion. Lots of people died from an Arab Spring that was kicked off by Libyans learning the State Dept's opinion of their government. The resulting revolutions wave left a trail of bodies but didn't make much change.
The State Department keeps its opinions secret for a reason.
This is a truly bizarre claim. You really think the popular uprising in Libya was caused because a different country criticized their government?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_Civil_War_(2011)#Backgr...
FTFY
> The resulting revolutions wave left a trail of bodies but didn't make much change.
A lot of the lack of change can be attributed to that same State Department. Secrets for a reason indeed.
Do you have a source for that? Look at the chats on wikipedia. The chat starts with an introduction then immidiately mentions access to classified networks.
Must we rewrite history?
>According to the documents, Lamo then placed a second call — this time to a business partner, a man named Chet Uber, and he told him what Manning had said. The business partner immediately left a message on the Army's Criminal Investigative Division tip line. That was on May 23, 2010, just two days after Lamo and Manning began their fateful exchange.
Any idea as to this motivation for the type of behaviour?