undefined | Better HN

0 pointst0astbread6y ago0 comments

Regardless of whether it was right to ditch Stallman as the president of the FSF, here's my "wishlist" for his successor (in case they don't revert it):

- Someone who is less of a hardliner: Stallman's dedication to free software is a good thing but his absolutist style of expressing it might have put a lot of people off who would otherwise not be opposed to the idea of free software

- Someone who understands the problems of free/open source software (contributors not getting paid, corporate exploitation, ...) and has progressive solutions for it

- Someone who everyone can (at least kinda) sympathize with and/or relate to: I believe Stallman generally has no bad intent but a lot of his mannerisms are just plain awkward or offensive to a lot of people. Normally that wouldn't matter but the president of the FSF (especially Stallman) is kinda "the face of free software". So showing that the world of free software is a progressive and inclusive space here might just benefit everyone.

We should still honor Stallman for what he did for free software (I mean he basically invented it) and we should IMO continue to welcome him in this space (maybe even as some kind of executive in the FSF because after all he's obviously not incompetent). But maybe he isn't the best person for the role of the president anymore these days.

0 comments

JaumeGreen6y ago

> Someone who is less of a hardliner: [...] his absolutist style of expressing it might have put a lot of people off

I think this is two different issues.

I wouldn't mind a softer talker, but I would prefer for that person to be a hardliner and someone who would open our minds to alternatives in the openess direction.

There are too many "money talks"/"free market solves it all" people in the world, if the front-person of FSF is a mediator then it will grow in that direction, instead of making the world see more spectrum.

t0astbreadOP6y ago

That might be a better way to put it

tombert6y ago

I agree with your second two points 100%, though not with the first at all.

I think that Stallman's hardliner stance, while it has scared away a lot of people, has also been a good thing in a lot of regards; if nothing else, it shows that there is a position to be had in the extreme copyleft.

t0astbreadOP6y ago

Understandable. My line of thought was that free software could, in some places where it's not big yet, win in the long term if the FSF stopped judging devs/makers of non-free software. (And instead maybe acknowledged that it's hard to develop free software in that field under the current circumstances to raise awareness.)

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

JaumeGreen6y ago

> Someone who is less of a hardliner: [...] his absolutist style of expressing it might have put a lot of people off

I think this is two different issues.

I wouldn't mind a softer talker, but I would prefer for that person to be a hardliner and someone who would open our minds to alternatives in the openess direction.

t0astbreadOP6y ago

That might be a better way to put it

tombert6y ago

I agree with your second two points 100%, though not with the first at all.

t0astbreadOP6y ago

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse