To date they’ve all had the same problem, which is that their energy efficiency is usually less than 5%, and often less than 1%. Compare this to a decent brushless DC motor, which will have an energy efficiency of 85%. Often their bandwidth is very low as well, like less than half a hertz. So they work okay if all you’re interested in is pull force and compactness, but they turn out to be really unsuitable for most robotic applications.
Note that this particular article gives neither an energy efficiency nor a bandwidth figure.
[0] something like this: https://www.donathenrc.com/mesh-sheathing
Human muscle also has a bandwidth in the ~2-5 Hz range.
See:
I am missing something? You can see the hackaday article about this here: https://hackaday.com/2014/02/21/researchers-create-synthetic...
Here is another, earlier iteration also from MIT: https://gizmodo.com/mits-new-plastic-muscles-could-bring-us-...
It might take several seconds to contract or relax; or it's fast contracting, but slow to relax. Much of it I think has to do with the thermal mass of the fibers/material, and how it takes longer to relax because the heat is being dissipated slower. Perhaps this could be mitigated using an active cooling system, but that also adds more complexity and takes up more space.
Hopefully these issues can be overcome in time, as such muscles and fibers are simpler, relatively cheaper, and more compact than many other actuators.
that would make it like real muscular systems, which must work in systems of opposition since actuation is one-way only (relaxation requires an opposing muscle, or some other force like gravity, to stretch it back out).
Eg: https://www.dfrobot.com/product-761.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjwyLDpB...
Perhaps not, perhaps there is no relation.
But, it might be an interesting subject of future investigation...