Obviously you will be detained if you try and prevent lawful execution of a search warrant. But its kind of a false equivalency saw that not providing a passcode is the same.

From the Justice John Paul Stevens dissent from Justice John Paul Stevens (487 U.S. 201)

  A defendant can be compelled to produce material evidence
  that is incriminating. Fingerprints, blood samples, voice 
  exemplars, handwriting specimens, or other items of 
  physical evidence may be extracted from a defendant
  against his will. But can he be compelled to use his 
  mind to assist the prosecution in convicting him of a 
  crime? I think not. He may in some cases be forced to 
  surrender a key to a strongbox containing incriminating 
  documents, but I do not believe he can be compelled to
  reveal the combination to his wall safe — by word or 
  deed.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/487/201 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/530/27.html

Strong crypto means the police can’t force their way in. But that doesn’t mean they should sprout new rights to force people to help.