undefined | Better HN

0 pointsluckylion7y ago0 comments

> anyone has the choice to switch to bing today, but many people have no choice of telecom provider

Do they though? I mean, bing exists, sure, but it's inferior and more expensive (by lacking quality). Hey, you can switch to satellite telephony/internet or connect two tin cans with a string if you really want to get off of your mobile provider.

> cellular internet doesn't work for all the people in areas with bad cellular reception to begin with

But the majority of US citizens have a choice, right, the population centers do have multiple carriers?

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

fzeroracer7y ago· 2 in thread

This would be a false equivalence, wouldn't it?

For example if I wanted to purchase internet, I have a choice of two providers. If I don't choose either of those two, I cannot have internet.

For search providers, I have a choice among a much larger variety. Google may have larger market share, but you're not locked into using Google like you are with your ISP.

There's a difference between having multiple potentially inferior choices and only having two choices full stop. In my experience living across multiple states now you don't have a choice of ISP.

luckylionOP7y ago

> For search providers, I have a choice among a much larger variety.

I'm from EU, Google has 95%++ market share here and there are not other serious options (besides Google's resellers, which are a bit slower, and not quite as good, but close). Bing exists, but the quality is abysmal, so it really isn't an option, just as satellite internet probably isn't for most US states (I assume - it is an option in Europe, albeit not a great one).

berbec7y ago

A counterpoint to that is that Bing's quality or accessability is not effected in any way by Google. Microsoft made a shitty search engine no one wants to use. Everyone CAN use it, so it is a viable option. Just like Le Bernardin is a viable option to McDonalds. (ignore the price difference, as it is immaterial to this discussion)

1 more reply

chillacy7y ago

> it's inferior and more expensive

Would breaking google into 4 companies give us 4 googles or 4 bings? Considering that the more data you have, the better your results, it seems like winner take all is the norm in any sort of data-driven tech.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse