Just to add to the explanation, "omakase" is Japanese for "I'll leave it to you". It's relatively common in sushi restaurants to have 2 ways to order - a la carte (or in japanese "tampin") where you choose exactly what you want, or "omakase" where you essentially say, "Give me what you recommend". One of the reasons for this is that there are definite seasons for fish. You can often get certain fish at most times of the year, but in winter it will have more fat, etc, etc. Similarly, the chef knows the quality of the fish that has been bought for the day and knows what's best. If you want the best, then usually you go for omakase, because you, as the customer, don't have a good way of judging the quality of the fish for the day. In some restaurants you even just say how much money you want to spend and the chef will try to fill you up with the best possible fish for the price.
The parallel, of course is that you can choose a language or framework that provides you with a lot of choice, but where you need to have have a corresponding amount of expertise in order to make good choices. Or you can choose a language or framework that is designed to more or less work out of the box without you needing to understand all of the details.
Where I think it breaks down is that in a sushi restaurant, ordering "omakase" every time you go will result in a completely different experience each time -- all tuned to give the absolutely best possible experience from an objective perspective. "Omakase" in a framework gives you a homogenised experience which will bring you up to a particular baseline, but which is almost certainly not tuned for your situation.
