undefined | Better HN

0 pointsetatoby7y ago0 comments

Just thought I'd add the same benchmark on the latest Dyalog APL.

Dyalog APL/S-64 (17)

    ⍴+.×⌿?2 3000 3000⍴1e10

    - size 3000: 6.6s, 0.5GiB RSS
    - size 10000: 101s, 5.4GiB RSS

Conclusions:

J's implementation is still the fastest at this particular task (matrix multiplication of huge matrices on a single CPU thread--granted, not the most significant of benchmarks.) Dyalog APL comes close behind. GNU APL and NumPy lag much more behind that.

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

Volt7y ago

I'm trying this with Dyalog 16 (Mac OS X) and I'm getting WS FULL. Do you know why that might be?

BTW, what kind of machine are you testing on?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse