Finland passes enhanced surveillance bills without a vote (opens in new tab)

I wonder why this was marked dead.

  tiedustelulaki 14 minutes ago [dead] [-]

  I'm currently launching https://tiedustelulaki.com/

  On this website I intend to collect as much information
  as possible about the politicians who supported this
  legislation, I hope to expose every last part of their
  private lives. Nothing will be off limits.

  I'm starting out with a total of 20000 euro budget in 
  cryptocurrency that I intend to use to fund some sort 
  of a bounty program in order to collect personal
  information on politicians who voted for this legislation. 

While the response might be considered over-the-top, it also reflects a level of concern and anger which HN readers may find helpful in understanding.

It's not that there was no vote so much as there was no opposition, so not vote was needed to pass it. It's as if it passed unanimously. Although this happened in a "nearly-empty plenary chamber", which makes one wonder about quorum -- did they have quorum?

Note that "without a vote" in this context means that no one in the plenary session opposed passing it, so no vote was held.

I'm currently launching https://tiedustelulaki.com/

On this website I intend to collect as much information as possible about the politicians who supported this legislation, I hope to expose every last part of their private lives. Nothing will be off limits.

I'm starting out with a total of 20000 euro budget in cryptocurrency that I intend to use to fund some sort of a bounty program in order to collect personal information on politicians who voted for this legislation.

I was not expecting this from a country like Finland.

I'm confused. Is it that there were no mp's who were opposed to the legislation? Or is it that there were, but it was somehow sneaked through without a chance for them to vote against it? Or what?

The article is scant on details - what was the bill and why was it controversial?

oh no, not Finland!