undefined | Better HN

0 pointsshawnz7y ago0 comments

So you're suggesting reusing a brand they've already used in the past except with a totally different meaning? And that will be less confusing?

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

microcolonel7y ago

I think morpheuskafka is saying that if they are going to reuse a brand, as is already proposed, they might as well use the least confusing and silly short name for wikimedia commons he can think of.

morpheuskafka7y ago

The name is Wikimedia Commons rn, they want to drop part of it. I'm just saying drop commons instead of media.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse