Ask HN: How much compensation would you like from "Hacker Monthly"?

As I mentioned here (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1856101):

We give our authors a print copy plus 1 year digital subscription. The comment contributors get the digital copy plus 1 year digital subscription.

Edit: And of course, full and proper credit (Thanks, Peter). The author also gets to link to his/her websites/twitter account in the his/her biography.

Hmmmm

You have a new account, and I think you are either trying to stir up some trouble or trying to hide who you really are. If this were a reasonable thing to bring up (in the manner you chose), then you wouldn't have to hide who you are.

However, you used the second person and directly addressed the reader twice (vs addressing the community) and it appears that you are trying to get people to "hop on the wagon" and protest the lack of fees after 'deciding' upon a fair approach.

If my post comes across as accosting, it is because you could have easily have said:

.

"Hacker News, is it fair that Hacker Monthly doesn't compensate its writers like other magazines? Should it?"

I'd like a link to my HN username, or Twitter username. No money needed.

I think we all frequently write for "free" on websites that earn money from user-generated content/ presence. I don't feel cheated by this.

It's a good investment to write for free (I think of it more like interacting or participating) because I learn stuff from smart people, get relationships with nice people, attention for stuff I work on, and am able to pass on attention to stuff I am a fan of.

I'm not opposed to writers getting compensated with money, but in this case i'm not sure it's the currency that would help either party out the most.

As presently, nothing. Just full and proper credit. (Though I believe you recently said a year's subscription comes as part of it, which is great!) Why? Because we don't produce blog posts, etc, in order to merely get into Hacker Monthly - it's just republishing work that's already been produced.

I dont think your first statement is true. Are magazines required to compensate their writers? I don't think that they are, it depends on the license applied to the original content. If there's no license they can only print it if Fair Use applies or copyright is reassigned.

We cannot examine the other issues when the assumptions in your first two sentences are in question.

I would rather see the price drop to $0 if not, drop the price by the amount you would be paying the authors. Alternatively, you can look into swag like free subscriptions for contributors.

Though I wonder what kind of change in dynamics on the site would we see once the mturk people find out that you can get paid for posting articles and comments at HN.

I don't have a view on the articles that are republished - I think it comes down to the case-by-case situation between the blog post writer and Hacker Monthly (some bloggers are pro writers and thus kind need to be paid others are blogging for fun and would enjoy the extra distribution).

I'd be interested, however, in seeing the comments left on HN licensed as Creative Commons-With Attribution. I'd personally be happy for commercial use, but I can see an argument for Non-Commercial Use only license.

Everything you write here is being ingested into BackType and a load of others places and being used for all sorts of stuff so why not just assume that comments belong to the ether and be done with it?

I would like to say nothing but I know some authors won't want to be included without the magazine being free in some form. I'm afraid this will jeopardize the quality of the articles and reduce overall readership. How about making the electronic (only) version free (again) and giving author credit/promotion.

Pay us in Karma points!

Nothing IMO. Or discounts on subscriptions.

I think it would be shameful to ask to be paid. These articles are mostly from people who just wanted to share their thoughts with the rest of the world. They are not writers.

Also most of these articles make it to HM because they stir up some interesting conversations. You can say the community makes the post popular. Should the community get paid too?

Links to projects, websites, a writers profile. Promotion can be useful, it doesn't have to be money.