undefined | Better HN

0 pointslotyrin7y ago0 comments

"$XXXX in a day" does not carry any such implication to myself, "$XXXX a day" would, but that phrasing seems to have been deliberately avoided -- and even had it been used I'd have to seriously investigate the context of such a headline before concluding the editor that has chosen such a headline thinks that this is something sustainable, scalable, and robust to sudden competition (... given such a thing is quite implausible in general).

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

alex_c7y ago

I stand by what I wrote. The human mind is generally not that rational and literal, especially when scanning a long list of headlines. The brain sees "$2500", "a day", subconsciously makes a connection that $2500 is more than the reader typically makes in a day, interest is created, link is clicked. No one proceeds to conclude that man is earning $912,500/year, but the connection is made and it's quite intentional from the headline writer.

Here's another example:

"Man makes $2500 in a day by buying a lottery ticket".

That is a weird sentence, because buying a winning lottery ticket is a discrete, non-reproducible event - so why include "in a day", unless it is to suggest something to the reader?

Or another one:

"Man makes $2500 in a day by winning competition after preparing for months" - you can see where I'm going with this.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse