Constant hit-piece after hit-piece.
They've burned any facade of objectivity, with the tone and repetitiveness of their reporting.
https://gizmodo.com/runaway-peacock-ditches-his-human-family...
https://gizmodo.com/heres-how-long-itd-take-you-to-poop-a-le...
How are posts like that at all relevant? I mean I'd rather read The Verge than what these people are putting out. The bias that Gawker had is that of a crazy person. They always told us that they were there for the people delivering hard evidence, but meanwhile give a damn about a person's rights to privacy, AND THEN CELEBRATED THAT FACT.
Check out Gawker's defunct site as it stands now. It's a dumpster fire that points fingers at everyone but themselves.
( I agree that Gawker media outlets are usually terrible )
Not gonna lie, that kinda took me aback.
True. It is painful to think about people being brought into this world, only to spend their lives worrying about money (or the basic survival in general). As an idea, or a moral maxim, working hard is inherently bad. Except when one enjoys it. But even then they should restrain themselves - just to see if there may be other good things in life.
(1555-1615 EST -- 2018-11-26)