undefined | Better HN

0 pointslorenzhs7y ago0 comments

Heavy use of complex AVX2 operations causes downclocking, too, but typically less so than AVX-512. More details are documented in https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/frequency_behavior -- also see e.g. https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/xeon_gold/6138#Frequencie... for an example how the frequencies differ depending on the number of active cores.

I think the reason for reducing clock speed when vector units are in heavy use is to keep power usage in check.

You might also find https://blog.cloudflare.com/on-the-dangers-of-intels-frequen... helpful, which goes into detail about a specific case where dynamic frequency scaling resulted in AVX-512 code running slower than AVX2 code.

0 comments

Twirrim7y ago

It's worth noting that the cloudflare test was done on a Xeon Silver, which has worse properties around the frequency changes than the Gold or Platinum. If you're on either Gold or Platinum, you're less likely to suffer the problems that Cloudflare did with mixed workloads.

This seems an optimisation nightmare. Your program needs to be aware both of the capability of the chip for using instructions, and what type of chip it is within a family to decide if you maybe do or don't want to use certain vectored instructions.

masklinn7y ago

And here are some of Lemire's own posts on the subject:

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/04/19/by-how-much-does-avx-512-s...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/08/13/the-dangers-of-avx-512-thr...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/08/15/the-dangers-of-avx-512-thr...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/08/24/trying-harder-to-make-avx-...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/08/25/avx-512-throttling-heavy-i...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/09/04/per-core-frequency-scaling...

* https://lemire.me/blog/2018/09/07/avx-512-when-and-how-to-us...

the84727y ago

The downclocking does not apply at all to simple 256bit bit juggling operations. The code in question should run at full speed.

kwillets7y ago