I believe mobile internet would have been an excellent opportunity to ship IPv6-only devices to a mass marketSome carriers (e.g. T-Mobile) are discussing going IPv6-only with NAT64+DNS64 to access IPv4 servers, but there are a few cases where this is worse than IPv4-only with NAT44 and very few cases where it is better. So you're basically proposing to make phones worse.
and that in turn would have resulted in a widespread adoption effect.
I don't see why.