The missing context from another comment was:
> ... amount of institutional inertia I've come up against while trying to get any part of our Development or Production stack shifted over to Kubernetes, which I consider myself fairly expert in, I think you'd understand that "containers on Solaris" is not going to go over any better for me than containers on GNU/Linux,
Both SmartOS and GNU/Linux are open platforms, so it really wasn't fair of me to accuse a person of shilling for Oracle. I think I understand.
(That wasn't my intention, but if you read it that way, that's my mistake.)
> I‘m against object oriented programming.
I just went back and read your profile again. Just wondering, what do you support instead? (At a guess I'd say functional programming?)
I've often heard and suspected for myself after gaining some "industry experience" that the Object-Oriented principles taken by themselves without a strong lead designer who is vocal about (his or her) strong opinions and willing to call out bloated, poorly thought-out designs... will simply tend toward generating a Big Ball of Mud, or "Shanty-town" code.
Is this generally how you feel about the subject? I think we'd probably get along well and I'd certainly like to hear from you again.
