Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
rco8786
7y ago
0 comments
Share
Sure. You could also replace the term “monorepo” with “separate repos” and your statement would be just as valid. Either way you go has pros and cons.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
hobls
7y ago
Agreed. I think the thing is that GitHub basically supports the separate repo approach fairly well out of the box. Using only a single repo requires more thought around your strategy, especially if you have multiple teams.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse