>
They designed a fix innovative enough to file a patent on, 22 months before they acknowledged the issue.They work on changes, ideas, and improvements all the time, and they have 1000s of similar patents for everything, doesn't mean the work that lead to that patent was a response to the specific product issue -- could be just a patent about avoiding dust in keyboards in general (a problem that harks back to the ages).
>That requires costly engineering time and organizational direction that is not used on a whim.
Again, you'd be surprised. It just requires the idea, and someone to write it in patent-ease. They have patents for all sorts of ideas and some make it into products while others never see the light of day. They literally use those "on a whim". For Apple filling a patent is peanut money.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/13/01/24/apple-exploring-s...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/03/23/apple-pate...
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-weight-lifting-fitness-...
https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/10/16452402/apple-patent-wa...
https://gizmodo.com/5058161/apple-patent-adds-quicklook-capa...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/09/23/apple-cu...
https://www.macstories.net/news/apple-patents-lcd-screen-tha...