Im thinking this might be an elaborate troll. I was surprised it didnt just have a rick roll instead of the phrase "your version of ubi is dumb". However its likely our fault for taking a document seriously that has the word "dumb" in the title.
I'm okay with people saying something is "dumb," I just request they have a well-reasoned argument for that position, and that they defend their position vigorously if it's important to them.
Ya well there is no attempt at a defense yet.
What im curious about is if this really just boils down to opposition to any and all forms of redistribution regardless of feasibility computations.
