First, that's really not a particularly charitable way of describing it. Second, it bespeaks an Analytic approach to things they don't understand -- that is, to assume they're meaningless and not important (or at best some trivial little puzzle to solve). Third, it really doesn't help to understand what Continental philosophy is actually about.

Now, if you'd described Continental philosophy as difficult or incoherent to you, then that would be more reasonable. But it should be pointed out that plenty of analytic philosophy that is also difficult and incomprehensible to some (though I would grant that for the most part Analytics at least try to be clear in their language -- something that can't be said of most Continentals).

Postmodernism is represented on the analytic side, too, e.g., Feyerabend: Against Method (unfortunately not on the list).

The late Wittgenstein (#1 on the list) can not be clearly labeled analytic or continental.

As final example, reading Foucaults (#12) insights about power structures in society and how they shape our view of reality, and considering that mumbo-jumbo, seems pretty unphilosophical to me.