Thanks for posting the first few links from using Google.
Here are some other links from Google that explains why your vociferous insistence is wrong.
http://www.crackssat.com/isee/word-problems/question-250-ans...
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/8680/how-much-ex...
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/increase-by-a-factor...
https://books.google.com/books?id=wDKLXdzQL5AC&pg=PA182&lpg=...
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/05/the_wall_street....
In addition to the short explanation in the last link, some of the comments on that page may help shed light, such as:
I'm a college student, and for the past few years I've been an SAT
tutor to pay the bills. 95% of my students do not know how to
calculate percentage change. I spend hours teaching kids this.
They usually start to get it after working with the formula several
times, and then I show them this:
for any number "n"
100% increase = n*2 = double
200% increase = n*3 = triple
300% increase = n*4 = quadruple
...
x*100% increase = n*(x+1)
When math is being discussed, even simple math, I'm going to go with the mathematical explanation not the arguments of populism. That's especially true for this case, where people are corrected in school and out of school constantly for the mistake you are promulgating.